Message #75

Date: Dec 02 1999 22:22:36 EST
From: william hunt <angelsonmysix@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fly Baby Fakers

Hey Everybody, New member here. Anybody from
Massachusetts or New England please chime in. I have a
finished fuselage and am about to start the wings. Two
questions 1. aircraft Spruce wants almost as much to
ship the spars as it is to buy them, lots of boat
shops out here would they possibably carry spruce that
would fit the bill? 2. Looks like my best buy on an
engine is an O-235c, am i looking at a weight problem
(I am building exactly to plans,I think it looks great
the way it is). Hey that Volksplane looks excellent!

--- Ron Wanttaja <ikvamar@gte.net> wrote:
> FlyBaby
> 
> Frank Stutzman wrote:
> >  What are the interface difficulties you mentioned
> > in your note, Ron.  Rigging aileron linkages are
> the only thing that I can
> > think of that would be that much of a headache.
> 
> The main one I was thinking of was going from a box
> spar (wide) to a
> plank spar (narrow).  Unless you come up with some
> massive kluge that
> joins the plank spar to BOTH the front and rear webs
> of the box spar,
> you'll have to just connect it to one web of the
> forward spar and one
> web of the aft spar.  Access to the end of the spar
> pin is complicated
> by the box, unless you make a long enough spar pin
> to go through both
> both the webs in one spar.
> 
> Matching the airfoil shape will take a bit of work,
> too.  The front spar
> is a bit forward of the maximum thickness of the
> airfoil, which would
> make it a bit easier than if it was right at the
> thickest point.
> 
> Finally, if you project the box spar all the way
> through the cabin,
> you'll see that it needs to occupy some of the space
> currently used by
> the control stick and linkage.
> 
> None of these is unworkable (after all, there has
> been at least one such
> Fly Baby built) but could really, REALLY slow up
> your building process
> as you try to solve these problems.
> 
> Ron Wanttaja